Michael Jackson: Innocent or Guilty?
You surely cant help but to have noticed the hoop-la and media coverage surrounding the alleged 'Trial of the Century' (which is no big deal considering this century just turned 5 a few months back).
Anyway, for the benefit of those of you who have been stuck in a cave for the past few months, here's the lowdown on what's happened thus far.
Michael Jackson gets litigated, again. He is being accused of committing all sorts of nefarious deeds, again. The accusing family threatens to sue his pants off (no pun intended), again. The various parties involved all wind up being interviewed on telly where they proceed to profess their innocence/ vent their accusations, bloody stinking again!!!
I know this is supposed to be the 'trial of the century', but it sure sounds a lot like the trial of that other century. Oh well...
Now time for me to get things straight. I for one, believe that Michael Jackson is innocent!
Why? Elementary my dear Watson (or whatever your name is) Firstly, nobody has ANY proof whatsoever that MJ did indeed commit those acts. No eye witnesses, no DNA evidence, no bits of MJ's jewelled glove stuck onto the boys balls. Nope, nada, nil.
Secondly, the family in question has a history of being a real arsey family which makes all sorts of false-accusations against, here's the good part, Mike Tyson, Jim Carrey and a gazillion other stars. Phew, talk about credibility down the stinking-crummy-tampon-clogged drain.
Thirdly, the fact that the family knew of MJ's previous accusations (which I believe were false), yet knowingly let their son spend huge amounts of time with the star just goes to show how moronic they are.
"Oooh, MJ has been accused of child molestation before. I think I'm gonna let me son frolic around his Neverland ranch coz frankly, I'm a dumb arse parent who cant make a single, honest buck!"
May justive prevail. I look forward to seeing you set free MJ.